Presentation Grading Rubric
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organization | The audience cannot understand the presentation because there is no sequence of information. | The audience has difficulty following the presentation. The presentation is choppy in nature. Transitions between topics are poor, minimal slides, mostly lecture. | Information is presented in logical sequence which audience can follow. The presentation flows smoothly from topic to topic. Some weaknesses either w/in or between topics. Slides fit well with spoken material, but could be improved. | Information is presented in logical, interesting sequence which the audience can follow. There are No weaknesses. | |
Subject Knowledge | Content presented is sparse. | Content presented is adequate but basic in nature. Some content is redundant. | Content presented has depth or breadth. | The content presented has depth and breadth. All areas covered extensively. | |
Graphics | The group uses superfluous graphics or no graphics. | The group occasionally uses graphics but they rarely support text and presentation. Graphics are poorly organized or their purpose is not clear. | The group's graphics relate to text and presentation. They are well organized, clear and easy to read. | The group's graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation. No flaws. | |
Mechanics | The presentation has 5 spelling and/or grammatical errors. | The presentation has 3 spelling and/or grammatical errors. | The presentation has 1 or 2 spelling and/or grammatical errors. | The presentation has NO spelling and/or grammatical errors. | |
Eye Contact | The presenters read all of the report with NO eye contact. | The presenters occasionally use eye contact, but still read most of the report. | The presenters maintain eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes. | The presenters maintain eye contact with audience seldom returning to notes. | |
Elocution | The presenters mumble, incorrectly pronounce terms, and/or speak too quietly for audience to hear. Many ums, so that they distract | The presenter's voice is low. The presenters incorrectly pronounce terms. Some audience members have difficulty hearing. Ums used frequently but not distracting. | The presenters pronounce most words correctly. Most audience members can hear the presentation. Few ums | The presenters use a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear the presentation. No ums. | |
Participation | The presentation is dominated by one group member. | Most group members present but segments of the presentation are not equal. | Most group members present equally. | All group members present equally. | |
Questions about Subject | The group does not have grasp of information; cannot answer basic questions about subject. | The group seems uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions. Only one group member exhibits the ability to answer questions adequately. | The group is at ease with all questions, but fails to elaborate. One or two group members answer all questions. | The group demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all questions with explanations and elaboration. All members participate in answering questions. | |
Group Members | |||||
Project
Title:
changed 3/6/03 mt
|