|
Gemstone Project Grading Rubric |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Section weight |
Total |
|
Organization |
The audience can not understand the presentation because
there is no sequence of information |
The audience has difficulty following the
presentation. The presentation
is choppy in nature. Transitions
between topics are poor, minimal slides, mostly lecture. |
Information is presented in logical sequence which
audience can follow. The
presentation flows smoothly from topic to topic. Some weaknesses either with in or between topics. Slides fit well with spoken material,
but could be improved. |
Information is presented in logical sequence which
audience can follow. There are
no weaknesses. |
.1 |
|
|
Subject Knowledge |
Content presented is sparse. 4-5 references |
Content presented is adequate but is basic in nature. Some content is redundant. 6-7
references |
Content presented has depth or breadth. 7-8 references |
The content presented has depth and breadth. All areas covered extensively. 9+
references |
.5 |
|
|
Graphics |
The group uses superfluous graphics or no graphics.
Graphics are not referenced |
The group occasionally uses graphics but they rarely
support text and presentation.
Graphics poorly organizes or their purpose is not clear. Most slides
are text heavy. Most graphics
are referenced. |
The group's graphics relate to text and presentation. They are well organized, clear and
easy to read. Some slides need
improvement or increased number of graphics. |
The group's graphics explain and reinforce screen text and
presentation. Appropriate number
of graphics are used. No flaws All graphics are referenced |
.25 |
|
|
Mechanics |
The presentation has four or more spellings/ grammatical
errors. |
The presentation has 3 errors. |
The presentation has 2 errors |
The presentation has no errors. |
.05 |
|
|
Eye contact and Elocution |
Read
all of report with no eye contact. The
presenters mumble, incorrectly pronounce terms, and speak too quietly for
audience to hear. Many ums - distracting. |
Occasionally use eye contact, but still read most of the report. The presenters
voice is low. The presenters
incorrectly pronounce terms.
Some audience members have difficulty hearing. Many ums, noticeable but not
distracting. |
Presenters maintain eye contact most of the time but frequently return
to notes. The
presenter pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear the presentation. Few ums, noticed |
Presenters maintain eye contact seldom returning to notes. The
presenters use a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so
that all audience members can hear the presentation. |
.05 |
|
|
Participation and Questions about subject |
The
presentation is dominated by one group member The
group does not have grasp of information; cannot answer questions about
subject |
All
group members present but the segments of the presentation are not equal.
The group seems uncomfortable with information and is able to answer
only rudimentary questions. Only
one group member exhibits the ability to answer questions adequately |
Most
group members present equally. The
group is at ease with all questions, but fails to elaborate. One or two group members answer all
questions |
All
members present equally. The
group demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all
questions with explanations and elaborations. All group members participate in answering questions |
.05 |
|